| He2+ + H0 → He+ + H+ | total |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=1) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(1s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=2) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(2s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(2p) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=3) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(3s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(3p) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(3d) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=4) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(4s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(4p) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(4d) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(4f) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=5) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(5s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(5p) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(5d) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(5f) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(5g) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(n=6) + H+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6s) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6p) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6d) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6f) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6g) + H+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + H0 → He+(6h) + H+ | nl-resolved |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATA REFORMATTED TO NEW ADF01 FORMAT. INPUT DATA FILE : JETSHP.CHEXDATA.DATA(HE2NEW1) SUB-BLOCK USED : 4 SUB-BLOCK TITLE : PREFERRED DATA HE(2+); ENERGY:1_800 KEV/AMU (FRITSCH/BELKIC/HOEKSTRA) COMMENT RECORDS FROM INPUT DATA FILE ARE APPENDED BELOW. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===================================================================== H(1S) + HE(2+) --> H(+) + HE(+) -------------------------------- INFORMATION #1989 RESTRUCTURED DATA ----------- THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE SELECTED BY IBLOCK IBLOCK = 4 ---------- ENERGY = 1 _ 800 KEV/AMU N = 1 _ 6 APPROX = BEST CHOICE FROM SEVERAL SOURCES (THEORY/EXPERIMENT) REFERENCE = FRITSCH/BELKIC/HOEKSTRA(FOM) REMARKS: THE DATASET IS OBTAINED BY MANUALLY FITTING CURVES THROUGH N - SHELL FRACTIONAL CROSS-SECTION DATA INFLUENCED MOSTLY BY FRITSCH , BELKIC AND HOEKSTRA. THERE IS A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN THE REGION 50 < E(KEV/AMU) < 200 THAT TENDS TO FRITSCH'S DATA IN THE LOWER ENERGY REGION, AND APPROXIMATES BELKIC'S DATA AT THE HIGHER ENERGIES. ALSO THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA OF HOEKSTRA ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHICH CONCERNS THE CAPTURE CROSS SECTIONS INTO N = 4 IN THE ENERGY REGION 2.5 < E(KEV/AMU) < 13.0 . FRITSCH, BELKIC, HOEKSTRA, RYUFUKU AND OLSON DATA WERE ALL ANALYSED USING NEUTBEAM.FORT(CXERROR) CODE. PLOTS OF ALPHA AND ITS APPARENT UNCERTAINTIES WERE PREPARED AND A PREFERRED ALPHA CURVE DRAWN MANUALLY. THIS ANALYSIS WAS ALSO USED TO DEDUCE A PREFERRED N=6 X-SECT. THE PREFERRED N-SHELL FRACTIONS WERE RENORMALISED USING ALPHA ONWARD FROM THE N=6 SHELL AND CONVERTED TO ABSOLUTE CROSS-SECTIONS USING THE PREFERRED TOTAL. LFORMA ,XLCUTA, PL2A AND PL3A ARE DERIVED BY FITTING SIGMA(N,L) USING THE A-D-A-S ENTRY PROGRAMME FOR CHARGE EXCHANGE DATA FOR PRINCIPAL QUANTUM SHELL N=4 AT ALL TABULATED ENERGIES J. FRIELING & H.P. SUMMERS 2 JAN 1990 ======================================================================= L-SPLITTING IS RECONSTITUTED FROM THE JET N-SHELL RESOLUTION DATA BLOCK USING ITS L-SHELL FORM PARAMETERS. THE DATA SET THUS EXACTLY MATCHES THE JET DATA SET IN APPLICATION. NOTE THE L-SHELL FORM PARAMETERS ARE OPTIMIMISED AROUND THE N-SHELLS RESPONSIBLE FOR VISIBLE LINE CHARGE EXCHANGE SPECTROSCOPY EMISSION. H.P. SUMMERS 28 JULY 1995 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------