| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+ + He+ | total |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=2) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(2s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(2p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=3) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(3s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(3p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(3d) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=4) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(4s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(4p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(4d) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(4f) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=5) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(5s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(5p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(5d) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(5f) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(5g) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=6) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6d) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6f) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6g) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(6h) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(n=7) + He+ | n-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7s) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7p) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7d) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7f) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7g) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7h) + He+ | nl-resolved |
| He2+ + He0(1s2s 3S) → He+(7i) + He+ | nl-resolved |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: The data consists of results of CTMC calculations made at the University of Missouri over the period 1997-98. Comments: The usual alpha parameters for high n-shell extrapolation were decided as a preferred curve through alphas deduced from adjacent n-shell cross-section pairs. For the helium receiver case, a convincing preferred curve was obtained with alpha always greater than 2.5. For the carbon receiver case, there was a much larger data scatter and the preferred curve dipped as low as 1.1. This was considered unsound without further investigation. The total cross-section obtained from the CTMC method is in fact a true total including all n-shells of the receiver rather than a sum simply over the the explicit partial cross-sections. We chose to recalculate alpha from the difference between the partial cross-section sum to n=9 from the total. The alphas as a function of energy in this case show smooth behaviour and do not fall below 2.5. It seems that this comparison provides a rough measure of convergence to asymptotic behaviour at high n of the CTMC calculations. It is safest to adopt the new alpha when it differs significantly from the older definition. Also n-shell extrapolation from the adf01 explicit data should be treated with great caution when the two alphas differ. The data was assembled as ADAS data files of type adf01 at JET Joint Undertaking in the period 29 June -1 July1998. Authors: R. Hoekstra*, J. W. Turkstra*, G. Lubinski*, R. E. Olson# * KVI, Groningen, Netherlands # University of Missouri, Rolla, USA. Date: 1 July 1998. Updates: Allan Whiteford, 17 Jan 2008 Changed an incorrect "nmin" label to "nmax" Removed DOS carriage returns ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------