szd02#li_li2.dat

• Li²⁺(1s1 ²S) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(2s1 ²S) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(2p1 ²P) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(3s1 ²S) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(3p1 ²P) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(3d1 ²D) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(4s1 ²S) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(4p1 ²P) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(4d1 ²D) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e
• Li²⁺(4f1 ²F) + e → Li³⁺ + e + e

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


   ISEL  INITIAL MET.        DESIG.             FINAL  MET.      DESIG.
           ION   CODE                            ION   CODE
   ----  ------- ---- ----------------         ------- ---- ---------------
     1   Li+ 2    1         1s1(2S)             Li+ 3    1         *
     2   Li+ 2    2         2s1(2S)             Li+ 3    1         *
     3   Li+ 2    3         2p1(2P)             Li+ 3    1         *
     4   Li+ 2    4         3s1(2S)             Li+ 3    1         *
     5   Li+ 2    5         3p1(2P)             Li+ 3    1         *
     6   Li+ 2    6         3d1(2D)             Li+ 3    1         *
     7   Li+ 2    7         4s1(2S)             Li+ 3    1         *
     8   Li+ 2    8         4p1(2P)             Li+ 3    1         *
     9   Li+ 2    9         4d1(2D)             Li+ 3    1         *
    10   Li+ 2   10         4f1(2F)             Li+ 3    1         *


  The rates were calculated using configuration-average ionization cross
  sections, with semi-relativistic wavefunctions, using the
  unrelaxed relaxed-core approximation, the prior form for the scattering
  potentials, and the natural-phase approximation.       
  They were then multiplied by the appropriate angular coefficients.


  Data generated by  Stuart Loch on 14-Jul-2002
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dependents

• ADF04 cpb02_ls#li2.dat